WORKSHEET
#9 - CRITICAL THINKING EXERCISE
DUE:
November 10 (In-class exercise)
Questions to
ask when evaluating resources:
1.
Who is the author? ____________________________________________________
2.
What do you know about the author? Occupation, title, education, experience?
______________________________________________________________________
Where did you look? ____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
3.
Why did the author write the article and do the research? What was his/her purpose?
______________________________________________________________________
4.
Who is the intended primary audience for the article? (check one)
general public ________
scholars ________
policy makers
________
teachers ________
professionals
________
5.
Has the author appealed to his primary audience in the writing style of the
article? In the presentation? How?
_______________________________________________________________________
6.
Does the author show a particular bias or does the author make assumptions and do
these biases or assumptions form the rationale for the research or the publication?
Explain.
_______________________________________________________________________
7.
What were the methods employed by the author to obtain the information or the
research?
_______________________________________________________________________
8.
Is the article based on
_____ public opinion
_____ interviews
_____ library research
_____ questionnaires
_____ laboratory experiments
_____ case studies
_____ standardized
personality tests
_____ market research
_____ public polls
_____ other
9.
Does the author arrive at a conclusion? If
so, what is the conclusion?
________________________________________________________________________
10. Are
the authors conclusions justified or supported satisfactorily by research or by
experience? Why or why not?
________________________________________________________________________
11. How
does this article compare with similar articles or similar studies? How would you find similar studies? Explain.
_________________________________________________________________________
12.
Does this article defy
conventional wisdom, established scholarship, professional practice, or other standards of
practice?
_________________________________________________________________________
13.
Are there significant
attachments or appendixes such as charts, maps, bibliographies, photos, documents, tests,
or questionnaires? If not, should there be?
_________________________________________________________________________
14.
Does the article form
an articulated whole rather than simply a sum, or a bundle of different parts? Is the information integrated?
_________________________________________________________________________
15.
These standards should be at work when annotating a work (book or article). What is an annotation?
Explain
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
How does an annotation differ from an abstract?
Explain
_________________________________________________________________________
Adapted from: Engeldinger, Eugene A.
"Bibliographic Instruction and Critical Thinking: The Contribution of the Annotated
Bibliography," Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, Winter 1988, p. 195-202